Washback Effect of General English Test of Ph.D. Entrance Exam on Science and Humanities Students: Perceptions and Practices

Document Type: Research Article

Authors

University of Isfahan

Abstract

Testing holds an important place in the Iranian test-oriented context where the entrance examinations have serious educational and occupational outcomes. This study aimed to explore the potential washback effects of the General English Language Test of the Ph.D. (GELTP) as part of the Ph.D. University Entrance Examination (PUEE) on the humanities and science students’ perceptions and practices. The study also examined the students’ language learning needs to examine the correspondence between the test-taker’s language needs as well as the GELTP requirement and content. To this end, the data were collected through conducting interviews with 16 Ph.D. students and the administration of a questionnaire to 560 students. Results revealed minor differences in the GELTP washback effects across the science and humanities perceptions and practices. Moreover, the findings showed some mismatch between the test-takers’ language needs and the test content that affected negatively the test washback effects. Findings can have implications for raising the education and assessment authorities’ awareness to employ the students’ feedbacks in designing and modifying high-stakes tests.

Keywords


Alderson, J. C., & Hamp-Lyons, L. (1996). TOEFL preparation courses: A study of washback. Language Testing, 13(3), 280-297.

Alderson, J. C., & Wall, D. (1993). Does washback exist? Applied Linguistics, 14(2), 115-129.

Andrews, S., Fullilove, J., & Wong, Y. (2002). Targeting washback-a case-study. System, 30(2), 207-223.

Andrews, S. (2004). Washback and curriculum innovation. In L. Cheng, Y. Watanabe, & A. Curtis (Eds.), Washback in language testing: Research contexts and methods (pp.37-50). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Bailey, K. M. (1996). Working for washback: A review of the washback concept in language testing. Language Testing, 13(3), 257-279.

Brown, J. D. (2008). Testing-context analysis: Assessment is just another part of language curriculum development. Language Assessment Quarterly, 5(4), 275-312.

Cheng, L. (1998). Impact of a public English examination change on students’ perceptions and attitudes toward their English learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 24(3), 279-301.

Cheng, L. Y. (2005). Changing language teaching through language testing: A washback study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cheng, L., Klinger, D., Fox, J., Doe, C., Jin, Y., & Wu, J. (2014). Motivation and test anxiety in test performance across three testing contexts: The CAEL, CET, and GEPT. TESOL Quarterly, 48(2), 300-330.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.

Damankesh, M., & Babaii, E. (2015). The washback effect of Iranian high school final examinations on students’ test-taking and test-preparation strategies. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 45, 62-69.

Douglas, D. (2001). Language for Specific Purposes assessment criteria: where do they come from? Language Testing, 18(2), 171-185.

Hayati, A. M. (2008). Teaching English for special purposes in Iran: Problems and suggestions. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 7(2), 149-164.

Hayes, B. M. (2003). IELTS preparation in New Zealand: An investigation into the nature of the courses and evidence of washback. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand.

Hughes, A. (1993). Backwash and TOEFL 2000. Unpublished manuscript. University of Reading, Malaysia.

Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for specific purposes: A learning-centerd approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hyland, K. (2007). English for professional academic purposes: Writing for scholarly publication. In D. Belcher (Ed.), Teaching language purposefully: English for specific purposes in theory and practice (pp. 20-45). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Khany, R., & Tarlani-Aliabadi, H. (2016). Studying power relations in an academic setting: Teachers' and students' perceptions of EAP classes in Iran. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 21, 72-85.

ISNA, (2012, November 21). Why did the Iranian Ph.D.  program entrance exams altered to be semicentralized. Retrieved April 20, 2016, from the World Wide Web: http://isna.ir/fa/news/91090100296

Loumbourdi, L. (2013). The power and impact of standardized test: Investigating the washback of language exams in Greece. Internationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften: Peter Lang GmbH.

Mazdayasna, G., & Tahririan, M. (2008). Developing a profile of the ESP needs of Iranian students: The case of students of nursing and midwifery. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(4), 277-289.

Pan, Y.-C., & Newfields, T. (2012). Tertiary EFL proficiency graduation requirements in Taiwan: A study of washback on learning. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 9(1), 108-122.

Qi, L. (2005). Stakeholders’ conflicting aims undermine the washback function of a high-stakes test. Language Testing, 22(2), 142-173.

Read, J., & Hayes, B. (2003). The impact of IELTS on preparation for academic study in New Zealand. IELTS Research Reports, 4, 154-205.

Sadeghi, S. (2012). A critical reflection on the high-stakes test’ effects: Towards a local model for teacher professionalism in Iranian preparation courses. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.

Saif, S. (2006). Aiming for positive washback: A case study of international teaching assistants. Language Testing, 23(1), 1-34.

Salehi, H., & Yunus, M. M. (2012). The washback effect of the Iranian universities entrance exam: Teachers’ insights. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies, 12 (2), 609-628.

Shohamy, E., Donitsa-Schmidt, S., & Ferman, I. (1996). Test impact revisited: Washback effect over time. Language Testing, 13(3), 298-317.

Spratt, M. (1999). How good are we at knowing what learners like? System, 27(2), 141-155.

Spratt, M. (2005). Washback and the classroom: The implications for teaching and learning of studies of washback from exams. Language Teaching Research, 9(1), 5-29.

Tsagari, K. (2006). Investigating the washback effect of a high-stakes EFL exam in the Greek context: Participants’ perceptions, material design and classroom applications. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Lancaster University, England.

Wall, D. (2000). The impact of high-stakes testing on teaching and learning: Can this be predicted or controlled? System, 28(4), 499-509.

Watanabe, Y. (2004). Methodology in washback studies. In L. Cheng, Y. Watanabe, & A. Curtis (Eds.), Washback in language testing: Research contexts and methods (pp.19-36). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Wu, J. R. (2012). GEPT and English language teaching and testing in Taiwan. Language Assessment Quarterly, 9(1), 11-25.

Xie, Q., & Andrews, S. (2012). Do test design and uses influence test preparation? Testing a model of washback with Structural Equation Modeling. Language Testing, 30(1), 49-70.