Iranian EFL Teachers’ Conceptions of Research: An Explanatory Mixed Methods Approach

Document Type : Research Article


University of Neyshabur


This study reports a mixed methods design investigation into language teachers’ conception of research. The study drew on various sources of data, including teachers’ responses to questionnaires items, qualitative comments in follow-up interviews, and contributions to e-mail inquiries. Results showed that the teachers’ understanding of research is mainly associated with a standard view of research. From the teachers’ perspectives, key elements of research include the existence of a priori research questions, objectives and rigorous data, a large number of participants, and the use of statistics for the analysis of results. Findings also pointed to the teachers’ consensus on the idea that educational research must address practical problems and have pedagogical implications. In addition, the teachers seemed to see research as a producer of new knowledge, an activity that will result in discovering and offering new pedagogical alternatives. The study concludes with the discussion of the underlying factors that have shaped the teachers’ views of research.


Akerlind, G. S. (2008). An academic perspective on research and being a researcher: An integration of the literature. Studies in Higher Education, 33, 17-31.
Allison, D., & Carey, J. (2007). What do university language teachers say about language teaching research? TESL Canada Journal, 24(2), 61-81.
Babbie, E. (1990). Survey research methods (2nd ed.). Belmont, California: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Barkhuizen, G. (2009). Topics, aims, and constraints in English teacher research: A Chinese case study. TESOL Quarterly, 43, 113-25.
Berg, B. L. (2007). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Biesta, G. (2007). Bridging the gap between educational research and educational practice: The need for critical distance. Educational Research and Evaluation, 13(3), 295-301.
Borg, S. (2006). Conditions for teacher research. English Teaching Forum, 4, 22-27.
Borg, S. (2007). Research engagement in English language teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 731-747.
Borg, S. (2009). English language teachers’ conceptions of research. Applied Linguistics, 30(3), 358-388.
Borg, S. (2010). Language teacher research engagement. Language Teaching, 43(4), 391-429.
Borg, S., & Alshumaimeri, Y. (2012). University teacher educators’ research engagement: Perspectives from Saudi Arabia. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 347-356.
Borg, S., & Liu, Y. (2013). Chinese college English teachers’ research engagement. TESOL Quarterly, 47(2), 270-299.
Brown, J. D. (1992). What is research? TESOL Matters, 2, 10-20.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
Burkhardt, H., & Schoenfeld, A. H. (2003). Improving educational research: Toward a more useful, more influential, and better-funded enterprise. Educational Researcher, 32(9), 3-14.
Campbell, A., & Jacques, K. (2004). Best practiced researched: Teachers’ expectations of the impact of doing research in their classrooms and schools. Teacher Development, 17(1), 75-90.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1999). The teacher research movement: A decade later. Educational Researcher, 28(7), 15-25.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
Everton, T., Galton, M., & Pell, T. (2000). Teachers’ perspectives on educational research: Knowledge and context. Journal of Education for Teaching, 26(2), 167-182.
Fenstermacher, G. D. (1994). The knower and the known: The nature of knowledge in research on teaching. Review of Research in Education, 20, 3-56.
Gao, X., Barkhuizen, G., & Chow, A. (2010). ‘Nowadays, teachers are relatively obedient’: Understanding primary school English teachers’ conceptions of and drives for research in China. Language Teaching Research, 15(1), 61-81.
Gurney, M. (1989). Implementer or innovator: A teacher’s challenge to the restrictive paradigm of traditional research. In P. Lomax, (Ed.), The management of change (pp. 13-28). New York: Multilingual Matters.
Kessels, J. P., & Korthagen, F. A. (1996). The relationship between theory and practice: Back to the classics. Educational Researcher, 25, 17-22.
Kiley, M., & Mullins, G. (2005). Supervisors’ conceptions of research: What are they? Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 49, 245-262.
Korthagen, F. A. (2007). The gap between research and practice revisited. Educational Research and Evaluation, 13(3), 303-310.
Kutlay, N., (2013). A survey of English language teachers’ views of research. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 188-206.
Lazaraton, A. (2005). Quantitative research methods. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 209-224). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
McDonough, J., & McDonough, S. (1990). What’s the use of research? ELT Journal, 44(2), 102-109.
McDonough, J., & McDonough, S. (1997). Research methods for English language teachers. London: Hodder Arnold.
McNamara, O. (2002). Evidence-based practice through practice-based evidence. In O. McNamara (Ed.), Becoming an evidence-based practitioner (pp. 15-26). London: Routledge Falmer.
Mehrani, M. B. (2014). Bridging the gap between research and practice: Voice of mediators. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 18(2), 21-39.
Mehrani, M. B. (2015). English teachers’ research engagement: Level of engagement and motivation. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 3(1), 83-97.
Mehrani, M. B. (in press). Action research: A brief introduction. Roshd Foreign Language Teaching.
Mehrani, M. B., & Behzadnia A. (2013). English teachers’ research engagement: Current barriers and future strategies. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 2(4), 17-32.
Mehrani, M. B., & Khodi, A. (2014). An appraisal of the Iranian academic research on English language teaching. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 6(3), 89-97.
Mehrani, M. B., Samar, R. G., & Behzadnia, A. (2012). Research on language teaching and learning in Iran: 2005 to 2010. Paper presented at The First National Conference on ELT in Iran, Islamic Azad University, Torbat Heydariyeh, Iran.
Mirhosseini, S. A., & Samar, R. G. (2015). Ideologies of English language teaching in Iranian academic research: Mainstream, alternative, and beyond. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 12(2), 110-136.
Nassaji, H. (2012). The relationship between SLA research and language pedagogy: Teachers’ perspectives. Language Teaching Research, 13(2), 337-365.
Ratcliffe, M., Bartholomew, H., Hames, V., Hind, A., Leach, J., Millar, R. et al. (2004). Science education practitioners’ views of research and its influence on their practice. New York: Department of Educational Studies, University of York.
Richards, K. (2003). Qualitative inquiry in TESOL. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Robson, C. (2002). Real world research (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
Samar, R. G., Mehrani, M. B., & Kiyani G. (2012). An investigation into the generalizability of quantitative research studies in Iranian ELT context. Comparative Language & Literature Research, 3(4), 193-213.
Samar, R. G., & Mehrani, M. B. (2012, October). Does the supply meet the demands? The mismatch between researchers’ interests and practitioners’ needs. Paper presented at The 10th International TELLSI Conference, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.
Shkedi, A. (1998). Teachers’ attitudes towards research: A challenge for qualitative researchers. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 11(4), 559-578.
Tom, A. (1997). Redesigning teacher education. Albany, NY: State University of New York.