Short- vs. Long-Term Effects of Reactive Incidental Focus on Form in Free Discussion EFL Classes

Document Type : Research Article


1 Department of Foreign Languages and Literature, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

2 English Language Department, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran

3 English Department, Faculty of Basic Sciences, Imam Ali University, Tehran, Iran


This study investigated the effectiveness of reactive incidental focus on form (FonF) for each learner with regard to different linguistic categories in meaning-oriented EFL classes. To this end, 30 hr of meaningful interactions of upper-intermediate EFL learners were audio-recorded in 2 free discussion classes. Instances of reactive incidental focus-on-form episodes (FFEs), where teachers offer on-the-spot corrective feedback to their learners’ linguistic mistakes, were extracted from the data. Furthermore, individualized tailor-made posttests were designed out of self-reported novel FFEs per learner. Results of learner-customized immediate and delayed posttests indicated that this type of instruction led to a substantial improvement in learning the focused language points. Achievement rates were found to be high in both test administrations. This efficacy was, however, more noticeable with regard to grammatical and phonological FFEs. Results reveal that reactive incidental FonF could enhance explicit knowledge of L2 learners both in the immediate context based on uptake rate and in the long run, as the findings from the immediate and delayed posttests demonstrated.


Alcón-Soler, E. (2007). Incidental focus on form, noticing and vocabulary learning in the EFL classroom. International Journal of English Studies, 7(2), 41-60.
Bell, N. (2012). Comparing playful and nonplayful incidental attention to form. Language Learning, 62, 236-265.
Chan, A., & Li, D. (2002). Form-focused remedial instruction: An empirical study. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12, 24-53.
Doughty, C. (1991). Second language instruction does make a difference: Evidence from an empirical study on SL revitalization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 431-469.
Ellis, R. (2001). Introduction: Investigating form-focused instruction. Language Learning, 51, 1-46.
Ellis, R., H. Basturkmen, H., & Loewen, S. (2001a). Learner uptake in communicative ESL lessons. Language Learning, 51, 281-318.
Ellis, R., H. Basturkmen, H., & Loewen, S. (2001b). Preemptive focus-on-form in the ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 35, 407-432.
Ellis, R., Basturkmen, H., & Loewen, S. (2002). Doing focus on form. System, 30, 419-432.
Gholami, J. (2017). Four key focus on form options. International Journal of Language Studies, 11(2), 161-171.
Gholami, J., & Aliyari, S. (2015). The impact of planned preemptive focus on form on Iranian EFL learners’ essay writing ability. International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning, 10(3), 1-12.
Hatch, E., & Farhady, H. (1982). Research design and statistics for applied linguistics. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
IELTS and the CEFR (n.d.). Retrieved from the World Wide Web:
Kamia, N. (2012). Proactive and reactive focus on form and gestures in EFL classrooms in Japan. System, 40, 386-397.
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). Understanding language teaching: From method to postmethod. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Lightbown, P., & Spada, N. (1990). Focus-on-form and corrective feedback in communicative language teaching: Effects on second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 429-448.
Loewen, S. (2005). Incidental focus on form and second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 361-386.
Long, M. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. de Bot, R. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39-52). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Nabei, T., & Swain, M. (2002). Learner awareness of recasts in classroom interaction: A case study of an adult EFL student’s second language learning. Language Awareness, 11, 43-63.
Nassaji, H. (2010). The occurrence and effectiveness of spontaneous focus on form in adult ESL classrooms. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 66, 907-933.
Nassaji, H. (2013). Participation structure and incidental focus on form in adult ESL classrooms. Language Learning, 63, 835-869.
Nassaji, H. (2016). Anniversary article interactional feedback in second language teaching and learning: A synthesis and analysis of current research. Language Teaching Research, 20, 535-562.
Pouresmaeil, A., & Gholami, J. (2017). Incidental focus-on-form in a free discussion language class: Types, linguistic foci, and uptake rate. The Language Learning Journal, 45, 1-13.
Saito, K., & Lyster, R. (2012). Effects of form-focused instruction and corrective feedback on L2 pronunciation development of /ɹ/ by Japanese learners of English. Language Learning, 62, 595-633.
Segalowitz, N., & Gatbonton, E. (1995). Automaticity and lexical skills in second language fluency: Implications for computer-assisted language learning. Computer-Assisted Language Learning, 8, 129-149.
Segalowitz, N., & Lightbown, P. (1999). Psycholinguistic approaches to SLA. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 19, 43-63.
Spada, N., Jessop, L., Tomita, Y., Suzuki, W., & Valeo, A. (2014). Isolated and integrated form-focused instruction: Effects on different types of L2 Knowledge. Language Teaching Research, 18, 453-473.
Spada, N., & Lightbown, P. (2008). Form-focused instruction: Isolated or integrated? TESOL Quarterly, 42, 181-207.
van Patten, B., & Cadierno, T. (1993). Input processing and second language acquisition: A role for instruction. Modern Language Journal, 77, 45-57.
Williams, J. (2001). The effectiveness of spontaneous attention to form. System, 29, 325-340.