Two Decades of Research Articles Keywords in Corpus-Based Studies in International Journal of Corpus Linguistics

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

English Department, Ilam University, Ilam, Iran

Abstract

Keywords accompanying abstracts are the metadata and topic representative features of research articles. They can enhance the retrieval, citation, and sorting of the studies in academia. Whereas keywords have been of interest to researchers in various fields of study, few, if any, studies have addressed them in a corpus-driven analysis. The present diachronic case study, then, aimed at analyzing 245 corpus-based studies to investigate their form, relevance, source, and frequency. Selected studies were published in International Journal of Corpus Linguistics from 1996 to 2016. Descriptive analysis of the data revealed that domain-specific keywords were the most frequent ones supporting the journal’s more specific taste. High percentage of keywords with one representation across the two decades alerted the chaos in selecting appropriate keywords. Lack of criteria in selecting the most relevant keywords and asymmetrical forms were among the salient results. Findings may be useful to the researchers, authors of research articles, as well as editors and publishers.

Keywords

References

Akbari, E., Rezaei, R., & Beheshti, Z. (2018). Common mistakes in English keywords of articles in the field of medical sciences education. Journal of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, 28(165), 150-158.  http://jmums.mazums.ac.ir/article-1-10954-en.html
Alcaraz, M. Á., & Méndez, D. I. (2016). When astrophysics meets lay and specialized audiences: Titles in popular and scientific papers. Language & Communication, 3(2), 133-146. http://hdl.handle.net/10045/60150
Alimohammadi, D. (2004). Measurement of the presence of keywords and description metatags on a selected number of Iranian Web sites. Online Information Review, 28(3), 220-223. https://doi.org/10.1108/14684520410543661
Ansari, M. (2005). Matching between assigned descriptors and title keywords in medical theses. Library Review, 54(7), 410-414. https://doi.org/10.1108/00242530510611901
Babaii, E., & Taase, Y. (2013). Author-assigned keywords in research articles: where do they come from? Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16(2), 1-19. URL: http://ijal.khu.ac.ir/article-1-1786-fa.html
Baker, P. (2006). Glossary of corpus linguistics. Edinburgh University Press.
Brezina, V., Timperley, M., & McEnery, T. (2018). #LancsBox v. 4.x [software]. Available at: http://corpora.lancs.ac.uk/lancsbox.
Chicco, D. (2017). Ten quick tips for machine learning in computational biology. BioData Mining, 10(35), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13040-017-0155-3
Craven, T. C. (2004). Variations in use of meta tag keywords by web pages in different languages. Journal of Information Science, 30(3), 268-279. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551504042805
Formatting and Style Guidelines (2020).  International Journal of Corpus Linguistics (IJCL). London: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Garcia, D. C. F., Gattaz, C. C., & Gattaz, N. C. (2019). The relevance of title, abstract and keywords for scientific paper writing. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 23(3), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2019190178
GburJr, E. E., & Trumbo, B. E. (1995). Key words and phrases—The key to scholarly visibility and efficiency in an information explosion. The American Statistician, 49(1), 29-33.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1995.10476108
 Gil‐Leiva, I., & Alonso‐Arroyo, A. (2007). Keywords given by authors of scientific articles in database descriptors. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(8), 1175-1187.  https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20595
Gil-Leiva, I. (2017). SISA-automatic indexing system for scientific articles: Experiments with location heuristics rules vs. TF-IDF rules. Knowledge Organization, 44(3), 139-162. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2017-3-139
Gross, T., & Taylor, A.G. (2005). What have we got to lose? The effect of controlled vocabulary on keyword searching results. College & Research Libraries, 66(3), 212-30. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.66.3.212
Hartley, J., & Kostoff, R. N. (2003). How useful are keywords’ in scientific journals? Journal of Information Science, 29(5), 433-438. https://doi.org/10.1177/01655515030295008
Holster, C., & Strobe, G. (2000). Web search behavior of Internet experts and
newbies. Computer Networks, 33(6), 337-346. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-1286(00)00031-1
Hopcroft, G. (2007). A beginner’s guide to metadata and keywords. Editors’ Bulletin, 3(3), 75-77. https://doi.org/10.1080/17521740701788437
Hurt, C. D. (2010). Automatically generated keywords: A comparison to author-generated keywords in the sciences. Journal of Information and Organizational Sciences, 34(1), 81-88.
Johnson, K., & Johnson, H. (Eds.). (1998). Encyclopedic dictionary of applied linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Kalwij, J. M., & Smit, C. (2013). How authors can maximize the chance of manuscript acceptance and article visibility. Learned Publishing, 26(1), 28-31. https://doi.org/10.1087/20130106
Kosharnaya, S. I., Chumak-Zhun, I. I., Plotnikova, L. Y., Maltseva, G. M., & Boldyreva, S. (2019). The title of a literary text as a discursive phenomenon. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Applied Linguistics Issues (ALI 2019), Saint Petersburg, Russia. https://doi.org/10.22055/rals.2019.14711
Lebrun, J. L. (2007). Scientific writing 2.0: A reader and writer’s guide. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
Mack, C. A. (2012). How to write a good scientific paper: Title, abstract, and keywords. Journal of Micro/Nanolithography, MEMS, and MOEMS, 11(2), 020101.1-4. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JMM.11.2.020101
Mahdabi, P., Andersson, L., Keikha, M., & Crestani, F. (2012). Automatic refinement of patent queries using concept importance predictors. Proceedings of the 35th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Portland, USA.
Mazaheri, E., Mostafavi, I., & Geraie, E. (2019). Comparison of intellectual structure of knowledge in international journal of preventive medicine with MeSH: A coword analysis. International Journal of Preventive Medicine, 10(201), 1-5.
Rath, A. (2010). Dual function of first position nominal groups in research article titles: Describing methods and structuring summary. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 5-23.
Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. W. (2013). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics. London: Routledge.
Schwing, T., McCutcheon, S., & Maurer, M. B. (2012). Uniqueness matters: Author-supplied keywords and LCSH in the library catalog. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 50(8), 903-928. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374. 2012.703164
Sohrabi, B., & Iraj, H. (2017). The effect of keyword repetition in abstract and keyword frequency per journal in predicting citation counts. Scientometrics, 110(1), 243-251.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2161-5
Strader, C. R. (2009). Author-assigned keywords vs. Library of Congress subject headings. Library Sources & Technical Services, 53(4), 243-250. https://doi.org/10.5860/lrts.53n4.243
Turney, P. D. (2000). Learning algorithms for key phrase extraction. Information Retrieval, 2(4), 303-336. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009976227802
Voorbij, H. J. (1998). Title keywords and subject descriptors: A comparison of subject search entries of books in the humanities and social sciences. Journal of documentation, 54(4), 466-476. https://doi.org/10.1108/ EUM0000000007178
Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics
Volume 13, Issue 1
April 2022
Pages 70-83

Files

Cited by

Share

How to cite

Statistics