Mutual Face-Maintaining Acts: An Analysis of Talks Between NBA Referees and Players/Coaches

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

National Sun Yat-sen University, Department of Foreign Languages and Literature, Taiwan

Abstract

By adopting Goffman’s conception of face, this study develops the notion of a mutual face-maintaining act (MFMA), with a view to striking a balance between avoiding the risk of making an overgeneralization about politeness and attempting to offer a perspective applicable to real-life interactions. Drawing on a type of sport conversation—talks between NBA referees and players/coaches—this paper elucidates the notion of an MFMA, demonstrating that it is more applicable to current sports data than Brown and Levinson’s Politeness Theory and that it can be a feasible concept for interpreting politeness phenomena. The finding suggests that speakers whose social duty and objective is primarily to reach communicative concord in conversational contexts that involve potential tension and conflict may be more inclined to produce utterances by performing MFMAs.

Keywords

References

Arundale, R. B. (2006). Face as relational and interactional: A communication framework for research on face, facework, and politeness. Journal of Politeness Research 2(2), 193–216. https://doi.org/10.1515/PR.2006 011
Arundale, R. B. (2010). Constituting face in conversation: Face, facework, and interactional achievement. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(8), 2078–2105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.021
Austin, J. L. (1965). How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.
Bargiela-Chiappini, F. (2003). Face and politeness: New (insights) for old (concepts). Journal of Pragmatics, 35(10-11), 1453–1469. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00173-X
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1978). Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In E. N. Goody (Ed.), Questions and politeness: Strategies in social interaction (pp. 56-289). Cambridge University Press.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage (Vol. 4). Cambridge University Press.
Buck, R. A. (1997). Towards an extended theory of face action: Analyzing dialogue in EM Forster’s A Passage to India. Journal of Pragmatics, 27(1), 83–106.
Chen, R., He, L., & Hu, C. (2013). Chinese requests: In comparison to American and Japanese requests and with reference to the “East-West divide”. Journal of Pragmatics, 55, 140–161.
Clark, H. H. (1996). Using Language. Cambridge University Press.
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. Psychology Press.
Goffman, E. (1955). On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychiatry, 18(3), 222–247.
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Anchor Books.
Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays in face-to-face behavior. Adeline.
Goffman, E. (1983). Felicity’s condition. The American Journal of Sociology, 89(1), 1–53.
Hashemian, M., & Farhang-Ju, M. (2017). A pragmatic study of speech acts by Iranian and Spanish nonnative English learners. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 8 (Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Language, Discourse and Pragmatics), 14–20. doi: 10.22055/rals.2017.12864
Haugh, M. (2013). Speaker meaning and accountability in interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 48(1), 41–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.11.009
Haugh, M., & Bargiela-Chiappini, F. (2010). Face in interaction [Editorial]. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(8), 2073–2077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.013
Izadi, A. (2015). Persian honorifics and im/politeness as social practice. Journal of Pragmatics, 85, 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.06.002
Izadi, A. (2016). Over-politeness in Persian professional interactions. Journal of Pragmatics, 102, 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.06.004
Izadi, A. (2017). Culture-generality and culture-specificity of face: Insights from argumentative talk in Iranian dissertation defenses. Pragmatics and Society, 8(2), 208–230. https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.8.2.03iza
Kalinina, S. G., & Gabdreeva, V. N. (2020). The intention of "apology" in speech etiquette: Based on the material of different structural languages. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 11 (Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Applied Linguistics Issues (ALI 2020), Saint Petersburg, 13–14 June 2020), 292–299. doi: 10.22055/rals.2020.16323
Kasper, G. (1990). Linguistic politeness: Current research issues. Journal of Pragmatics, 14(2), 193–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90080-W
Koutlaki, S. A. (2002). Offers and expressions of thanks as face enhancing acts: Tæ’arof in Persian. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(12), 1733–1756. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(01)00055-8
Leech, G. N. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. Longman.
Locher, M. A., & Watts, R. (2005). Politeness theory and relational work. Journal of Politeness Research, 1(1), 9–33.
Mao, R. L. (1994). Beyond politeness theory “face” revisited and renewed. Journal of Pragmatics, 21, 451–486.
Schmidt, R. W. (1980). Questions and politeness: Strategies in social interaction. RELC Journal, 11(2), 100–114.
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press.
Spencer-Oatey, H. (2007). Theories of identity and the analysis of face. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(4), 639–656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.12.004
Zarei, G., & Mohammadi, M. (2012). E-politeness in Iranian English electronic requests to the faculty. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 3(1), 3–24.
Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics
Volume 13, Issue 2
Special Edition: Politeness and Impoliteness Research
September 2022
Pages 44-52

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics