Anthony, L. (2021). AntConc (Version 3.5.9) [Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. https://www.laurenceanthony.net/software
Biber, D. (1988). Variation across speech and writing. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621024
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow, England: Longman.
Biber D., & Gray, B. (2010). Challenging about academic writing: Complexity, elaboration, explicitness. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9, 2–20. https://doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2010.01.001
Biber D., & Gray, B. (2011). Grammatical change in the noun phrase: The influence of written language use. English Language and Linguistics, 15(2), 223–250. https://doi.10.1017/S1360674311000025
Biber, D., & Gray, B. (2016). Grammatical complexity in academic English: Linguistic change in writing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511920776
Biber D., Gray, B., & Staples, S. (2016). Contrasting the grammatical complexities of conversation and academic writing: Implications for EAP writing development and teaching. Language in Focus Journal, 2(1), 1-18. https://doi: 10.1515/lifijsal-2016-0001
Biber D., Gray, B., Staples, S., & Egbert, J. (2020). Investigating grammatical complexity in L2 English writing research: Linguistics description versus predictive measurement. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 46, [100869]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100869
Carter-Thomas, S., & Rowley-Jolivet, E. (2008). If-conditionals in medical discourse: From theory to disciplinary practice. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(3), 191–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2008.03.004
Castelo, L. M. P., & Monaco, L. M. (2013). Conditions and their functions in women’s scientific writing. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 13, 160–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.635
Charles, M. (2011). Making concessions in academic writing: A corpus study of patterns and semantic sequences. In Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics Conference 2011 (pp. 1–14), University of Birmingham.
Cho, D. W., & Lee, K. (2016). English relative clauses in science and engineering journal papers: A comparative corpus-based study for pedagogical purposes. Ampersand, 3, 61–70. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2016.03.002
Dayag, D. T. (2014). Preposition stranding and pied-piping in Philippine English: A corpus-based study. In G. Leitner, A. Hashim, & H. Wolf (Eds.), Communicating with Asia: The future of English as a global language (pp. 102-119). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107477186.008
Diessel, H., & Hetterle, K. (2011). Causal clauses: A crosslinguistic investigation of their structure, meaning, and use. In P. Siemund (Ed.), Linguistic universals and language variation (pp. 1-29). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110238068.23
Egbert, J., Larsson, T., & Biber, D. (2020). Doing corpus linguistics with a corpus. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108888790
Flowerdew, J. (2013). English for research publication purposes. In B. Paltridge, & S. Starfield (Eds.), The handbook of English for specific purposes (pp. 301-322). Boston, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi:10.1002/9781118339855
Gray, B. (2015). Linguistic variation in research articles: When discipline tells only part of the story. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.71
Guillaume, B. (2018). Looking for the causal values of as and since in large corpora, and how these values compare with each other. Corpus, 18, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.4000/corpus.3628
Gustilo, L. E. (2010). “Although if is more frequent than whether...”: An analysis of the uses of adverbial clauses in Philippine English research articles. Philippine ESL Journal, 4, 24-44.
Hernandez, H. P. (2020). Comparative analysis of the textual resources in academic texts in Philippine and American Englishes from Systemic Functional Linguistic perspective. Journal of English as an International Language, 15(1), 17-43. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1259909
Hernandez, H. P. (2021). Syntactic description of research articles across disciplines [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Philippine Normal University.
Hernandez, H. P. (2022). Prepositional phrases as noun postmodifiers in disciplinary research articles authored by Filipino researchers: A cross-examination. International Journal of Language Studies, 16(1), 21-44.
Hinkel, E. (2014). Second language writers’ text: Linguistic and rhetorical features. New York, NY: Routledge.
Huebler, A. (1983). Understatements and hedges in English. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/pb.iv.6
Hyland, K. (2006). Disciplinary differences: Language variation in academic discourses. In Hyland, K. & Bondi, M. (Eds.), Academic discourse across disciplines. New York, NY: Peter Lang. https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-0351-0446-2
Hyland, K. (2007). Applying a gloss: Exemplifying and reformulating in academic discourse. Applied Linguistics, 28(2), 266-285. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm011
Hyland, K., & Tse, P. (2005). Hooking the reader: A corpus study of evaluative that in abstracts. English for Specific Purposes, 24, 123-139.
Jacobs, R. (1995). English syntax: A grammar for English language professionals. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Jenkins, J. (2015). Global Englishes: A resource book for students (3rd ed). London, UK: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315761596
Kachru, B. B. (1997). English as an Asian language. In M. L. S. Bautista (Ed.), English is an Asian language: The Philippine context (pp. 1-23). Sydney, Australia: The Macquarie Library Pty., Ltd.
Khedri, M., & Konstantinos, K. (2018). Metadiscourse in applied linguistics and chemistry research article introductions. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 9(2), 47-74.
Kim, C., & Crosthwaite, P. (2019). Disciplinary differences in the use of evaluative that: Expression of stance via that-clauses in business and medicine. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 41, 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100775
Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (2002). A communicative grammar of English (3rd ed.). London, UK: Longman. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315836041
Lillis, T. M., & Curry, M. J. (2010). Academic writing in a global context: The politics and practices of publishing in English. New York, NY: Routledge.
Lillis, T. M., & Curry, M. J. (2016). Academic writing for publication in a multilingual world. In R. M. Manchón, & P. K. Matsuda (Eds.), Handbook of second and foreign language writing (pp. 201-222). Boston, MA: Walter de Gruyter Inc. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614511335
Meyer, C. F. (2004). English corpus linguistics: An introduction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Myers, G. (1989). The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles. Applied Linguistics, 10(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/10.1.1
Nelson, M. (2010). Building a written corpus: What are the basics? In A. O’Keefe & M. McCarthy (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of corpus linguistics (pp. 53-65). London, UK: Routledge. https://doi.10.4324/9780203856949
Paltridge, B. (2013). Genre and English for specific purposes. In B. Paltridge, & S. Starfield (Eds.), The handbook of English for specific purposes (pp. 347-366). Boston, MA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi:10.1002/9781118339855
Pan, F., Reppen, R., & Biber, D. (2016). Comparing patterns of L1 versus L2 English academic professionals: Lexical bundles in Telecommunications research journals. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 21, 60-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.11.003
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svatvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London, UK: Longman.
Rahimpour, S., Sotoudehnama, E., & Sasani, F. (2018). Investigation into researcher identity in qualitative research articles in applied linguistics journals through lens of CDA. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 9(2), 74-100.
Ren, J. (2021). Variability and functions of lexical bundles in research articles of applied linguistics and pharmaceutical sciences. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 50, [100968]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2021.100968
Rezaee, A. A., Nemati, M., & Golparvar, S. E. (2018). Discourse-pragmatic and processing-related motivators of the ordering of reason clauses in an academic corpus. Research in Language, 16(3), 325-339. https://doi.org/10.2478/rela-2018-0014
Rowley-Jolivet, E., & Carter-Thomas, S. (2008). When practice belies ‘theory’: Form, function and frequency of if-conditionals in specialized discourse. ASp, 51-52, 39-61. https://doi.org/10.4000/asp.343
Shahab S., Rasidi, N., Seddighi, F., & Yamini, M. (2019). Peeling the onion: A textual CDA of research articles in humanities and basic sciences. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 10(1), 108-131.
Soodmand Afshar, H., Doosti, M., & Movassagh, H. (2018). A comparative study of generic structure of applied linguistics and chemistry research articles: The case of discussions. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 9(1), 28-56.
Soodmand Afshar, H. S., & Ranjbar, A. (2017). A comparative study of rhetorical moves adopted in research questions and method sections of applied linguistics research articles. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 8(1), 46-71.
Swales, J. M. (2001). EAP-related linguistic research: An intellectual history. In J. Flowerdew & M. Peacock (Eds.), Research Perspectives on English for Academic Purposes (pp. 42-54). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524766
Swales, J. M. (2004). Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (2012). Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills. Michigan, USA: University of Michigan Press. http://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.2173936
Validi, M., Jalilifar, A., Shooshtari, Z. G., & Hayati, A. (2016). Medical research article introductions in Persian and English contexts: Rhetorical and metadiscoursal differences. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 73-98.
van Enk, A., & Power, K. (2017). What is a research article? Genre variability and data selection in genre research. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 29, 1-11. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2017.07.002
Warchal, K. (2010). Moulding interpersonal relations through conditional clauses: Consensus-building strategies in written academic discourse. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9, 140-150. https://doi.10.1016/j.jeap.2010.02.002
)