Foreign Language Semantic Categorization: Evidence From the Semantic Network and Word Connections

Document Type : Research Article

Author

Department of Modern Philologies, Faculty of Letters and Education, University of La Rioja, Logroño, Spain

10.22055/rals.2023.18077

Abstract

Categorization is an essential cognitive activity to make sense of the world. Category-generating and word association studies help us elucidate how learners organize words in the mind. Categorization can indicate how learners acquire new vocabulary and how they use it to interpret reality. The present study analyses the word retrieval mechanisms of two groups of learners by looking into the word-pair associations produced as a response to a category-generation task. These associations in response to two semantic categories: countryside and animals were classified and scrutinized for shared patterns. Differences and similarities between semantic categories, and proficiency level of learners were explored. Results revealed learners favour coordination as the preferred mechanism for word attachment and retrieval, followed by event-based associations (metaphorical/ contextual and experiential knowledge). Although frequencies vary significantly depending on L2 proficiency and semantic category, associational behaviours are comparable, with a preference for semantic associations over formal and presence of both taxonomic and thematic associations. The implications of these findings can reach the EFL classroom by informing which words to teach together and through which strategies.

Keywords


Aitchison, J. (1994): Words in the mind: An introduction to the mental lexicon. Basil Blackwell.
Babko, K., O. Samarkina, N., Kh. Fazlyeva, Z., & Carlson, C. (2019). The real psycholinguistic meaning of a word and metaphorically reinterpreted component correlation (based on English phraselogical Units). Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 10 (Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Applied Linguistics Issues (ALI 2019) July 19-20, 2019, Saint Petersburg, Russia), 855-861. doi: 10.22055/rals.2019.15158
Bartol Hernández, J. A. (2006). La disponibilidad léxica. Revista Española de Lingüística, 36, 379–396.
Borge-Holthoefer, J., & Arenas, A. (2010) Semantic networks: Structure and dynamics. Entropy, 12, 1264–1302.
Borodkin, K, Kenett, Y., Faust, M., & Mashal, N. (2016). When pumpkin is closer to onion than to squash: The structure of the second language lexicon. Cognition, 15(6), 60-70.
Cambridge English Vocabulary Lists (2012). https://www.cambridgeenglish.org/images/84669-pet-vocabulary-list.pdf
Chaffin, R. (1997). Associations to unfamiliar words: Learning the meanings of new words Memory & Cognition 25(2), 203-226.
Cherven, K. (2015). Mastering Gephi network visualization. Packt Publishing.
Collins, A.M., & Loftus, E.F., (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychol Review, 82(6), 407–428.
Collins, A.M., & Quillian, M.R. (1969). Retrieval time from semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviou, 8(2), 240–248.
Coni, A.G., Ison, M., & Vivas, J. (2019). Conceptual flexibility in school children: Switching between taxonomic and thematic relations. Cognitive Development, 52, 100827.
Cuenca, M.J., & Hilferty, J. (1999). Introducción a la lingüística cognitiva. Ariel.
De Deyne, S., Kenett, Y. N., Anaki, D., Faust, M., & Navarro, D. (2017). Large-scale network representations of semantics in the mental lexicon. In M. N. Jones (Ed.), Big data in cognitive science (pp. 174–202). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
Ferreira, R. A., & Echeverría, M. S. (2010). Redes semánticas en el léxico disponible de inglés L1 e inglés LE. Onomázein, 21, 133–153.
Fitzpatrick (2006). Habits and rabbits: Word associations and the L2 lexicon. EUROSLA Yearbook 6, 121-145.
Fitzpatrick, T. (2007). Word association patterns: Unpacking the assumptions. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 17(3), 319–331.
Fitzpatrick, T., & C. Izura. (2011). Word association in L1 and L2: An exploratory study of response types, response times, and interlingual mediation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 33(3). 373–398.
Fitzpatrick, T., Playfoot, D., Wray, A., & Wright, M. (2013). Establishing the reliability of word association data for investigating individual and group differences. Applied Linguistics. doi: 10.1093/applin/amt020.
Fitzpatrick, T., & Thwaites, P. (2020). Word association research and the L2 lexicon. Language Teaching, 53(3), 237-274. doi: 10.1017/S0261444820000105.
Gudmundson, A. (2020). The mental lexicon of multilingual adult learners of Italian L3: A study of word association behavior and cross-lingual semantic priming. In Camilla Bardel & Laura Sánchez (eds.), Third language acquisition: Age, proficiency and multilingualism, (pp. 67–109). Language Science Press.
Henríquez Guarín, M.C, Mahecha Mahecha, V., & Mateus Ferro, G. (2016). Análisis de los mecanismos cognitivos del léxico disponible del Cuerpo humano a través de grafos. Lingüística y Literatura, 69, 229-251.
Hernández Muñoz, N. (2005). La disponibilidad léxica: una herramienta fronteriza para el estudio del léxico en Lingüística y Psicología. Estudios sobre adquisición del lenguaje. (pp. 942-954): Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca.
Hernández Muñoz, N. (2014). Categorías en el léxico bilingüe: perspectivas desde el priming semántico interlenguas y la disponibilidad léxica. RAEL: Revista electrónica de lingüística aplicada,13(1), 19-38.
Hernández Muñoz, N. & López García, A. (2014). Análisis de las relaciones semánticas a través de una tarea de libre asociación en español con mapas auto-organizados. RLA: Revista de Lingüística Teórica y Aplicada, 52(2), 189-216.
Higginbotham, J. (2010). Individual learner profiles from word association tests: The effect of word frequency. System, 38, 379-390.
Jiménez Catalán, R.M. (Ed.). (2014). Lexical availability in English and Spanish as a second language. Springer.
Jiménez Catalán, R.M. (2022). Lexical profiles of children and adolescent EFL learners in the semantic domain of animals. In Vanessa De Wilde & Claire Goriot (eds.), Second language learning before adulthood: Individual differences in children and adolescents, (pp. 133-154). De Gruyter Mouton. .
Karuza, E. A., Thompson-Schill, S. L., & Bassett, D. S. (2016).Local patterns to global architectures: Influences of network topology on human learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(8), 629–640.
Lin, E.L., & Murphy, G. L. (2001). Thematic relations in adults’ concepts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130 (1):3–28.
Lucariello, J., Kyratzis, A., & Nelson, K. (1992). Taxonomic knowledge: What kind and when? Child Development 63(4), 978-998.
Mahecha, V., & Mateus, G. (2017). El léxico disponible y sus mecanismos de asociación: Un análisis con grafos. In Florencia del Barrio de la Rosa (ed.), Palabra, Vocabulario, Léxico. La lexicología aplicada a la didáctica y a la diacronía, (pp. 123-142). Università Ca’ Foscari.
Malt, B.C., & Sloman, S.A., (2003). Linguistic diversity and object naming by non-native speakers of English. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 6(01), 47–67.
Meara, P. (1982). Word associations in a foreign language: A report on the Birkbeck vocabulary project. Nottingham Linguistic Circular, 11(2), 29-37.
Mirman, D., Landrigan, J.F., & Britt, A.E. (2017). Taxonomic and thematic semantic systems. Psychological Bulletin, 143(5), 499–520.
Morais, A.S., Olsson, H., & Schooler, L.J. (2013). Mapping the structure of semantic memory. Cognitive Science, 37(1), 125-145.
Murphy, G.L. (2001). Causes of taxonomic sorting by adults: A test of the thematic-to-taxonomic shift. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8(4), 834–839.
Najjari, R., & Mohammadi, M. (2018). Metaphorical conceptualization of SPORT through TERRITORY as a vehicle. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 9(1), 127-147. doi:10.22055/rals.2018.13408
Namei, S. (2004). Bilingual lexical development: A Persian–Swedish word association       study. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 14(3), 363-388.
Instituto Cervantes (2006). Plan curricular del Instituto Cervantes. Niveles de referencia para el español. Madrid: Instituto Cervantes- Biblioteca nueva.
Pavlenko, A. (2009). Conceptual representation in the bilingual lexicon and second language vocabulary learning. In Pavlenko, A. (Ed.), The bilingual mental lexicon: Interdisciplinary approaches (pp. 125-160). Multilingual Matters.
Peppard, J. (2007). Exploring the relationship between word-association and learners’ lexical development. Center for English Language Studies: University of Birmingham.
Peña, E.D., Bedore, L.M., & Zlatic-Giunta, R. (2002). Category-generation performance of bilingual children: The influence of condition, category, and language. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 45, 938–947.
Precosky, K. (2011). Exploring the mental lexicon using word association tests: How do native and non-native speakers of English arrange words in the mind? (PhD thesis). University of Birmingham.
Pranoto, B.E., & Afrilita, L. K. (2018). The organization of words in mental lexicon: Evidence from word association test. TEKNOSASTIK, 16(1), 26-33.
Quick, A., & Verschik, A. (2019). Usage-based contact linguistics: An introduction to the special issue. Applied Linguistics Review, 10, 1-13.
Rashidi, N., & Mirsalari, S. (2017). Investigating the relationship between Iranian EFL learners’ use of strategies in collocating words and their proficiency level. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 8(2), 93-118. doi: 10.22055/rals.2017.13093
Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch, & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 27–48). Erlbaum.
Roux, P. W. (2013). Words in the mind: Exploring the relationship between word association and lexical development. Polyglossia, 24, 80–91.
Sass, K., Sachs, O., Krach, S., & Kircher, T. (2009). Taxonomic and thematic categories: Neural correlates of categorization in an auditory-to-visual priming task using fMRI. Brain Research. 1270:78–87. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.03.013.
Sánchez-Saus Laserna, M. (2016). Léxico disponible de los estudiantes de español como lengua extranjera en las universidades andaluzas. Universidad de Sevilla.
Schmitt, N. (1998) Tracking the incremental acquisition of second language vocabulary: A longitudinal study. Language Learning, 48, 281-317.
Séguin, M. (2015). Exploration of the relationship between word-association and learners’ lexical development with a focus on American L1 and Croatian L2 speakers. ExELL (Explorations in English Language and Linguistics), 3(2), 80-101
Sheng, L., McGregor, K.K., & Marian, V. (2006). Lexical–semantic organization in bilingual children: Evidence from a repeated word association task. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 49(3), 572–587.
Shivabasappa P., Peña E. D., & Bedore L. M. (2017). Typicality effect and category structure in Spanish–English bilingual children and adults. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60(6), 1577–1589.
Šifrar Kalan, M. (2014). Disponibilidad léxica en diferentes niveles de español/lengua extranjera. Studia Romanica Posnaniensia, 41(1), 63–85.
Steyvers, M., & Tenenbaum, J.B. (2005). The large-scale structure of semantic networks: Statistical analyses and a model of semantic growth. Cognitive Science, 29, 41–78 16.
Tomé Cornejo, C. (2015). Léxico disponible. Procesamiento y aplicación a la enseñanza de ELE. Universidad de Salamanca, tesis doctoral.
Vitevich, M. (2008). What can graph theory tell us about word learning and lexical retrieval? Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 51(2): 408–422.
Wolter, B. (2001). Comparing the L1 and the L2 mental lexicon: A depth of individual word knowledge model. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23(1), 41–69.
Zareva, A., Schwanenflugel, & Nikolova Y. (2005) Relationship between lexical competence and language proficiency: Variable sensitivity. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 567–95.
Zareva, A. 2007. Structure of the second language mental lexicon: How does it compare to native speakers’ lexical organization? Second Language Research, 23(2), 123–153.