Vietnamese EFL Learners’ Productive Derivative Knowledge: The Role of Part of Speech, Receptive Derivative Knowledge, and Derivative-Formation Strategies

Nguyen, Bao Trang Thi; Nguyen, Thuy Ho Hoang; Nguyen, Long Quoc; Vo, Lien-Huong; Dung, Do Thi Xuan

doi:10.22055/rals.2024.46383.3252

Vietnamese EFL Learners’ Productive Derivative Knowledge: The Role of Part of Speech, Receptive Derivative Knowledge, and Derivative-Formation Strategies

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

Bao Trang Thi Nguyen ¹

Thuy Ho Hoang Nguyen ¹

Long Quoc Nguyen ²

Lien-Huong Vo ¹

Do Thi Xuan Dung ³

¹ Faculty of English, University of Foreign Languages and International Studies, Hue University, Hue, Vietnam

² Faculty of English, FPT University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

³ Hue University, Hue, Vietnam

10.22055/rals.2024.46383.3252

Abstract

This study examines the role of part of speech (POS) and receptive derivative knowledge (RDK) in Vietnamese EFL learners’ production of derived forms of given headwords (henceforth, productive derivative knowledge (PDK). Seventy-three Vietnamese EFL university learners, first, performed a decontextualised productive derivative form-recall test of 90 headwords and a receptive derivative test. Twenty of these learners were also interviewed in an in-depth individual format with a view to understanding their experiences and processes of forming the target derivatives. Findings revealed that successful production rates of derivatives of different POS differed significantly in favor of verb and noun derivatives than adjective and adverb counterparts, and there was a strong positive correlation between PDK and RDK. Learners’ perspectives uncovered a complex process of forming derivatives that involved not only item-based and system-based mechanisms but also a wide range of other strategies and idiosyncratic trajectories of vocabulary learning/use that influenced their PDK. The implications for derivative instruction, assessment, and research are discussed.

Keywords

Productive Derivative Knowledge

Receptive Derivative Knowledge

Vietnamese EFL Learners

Part of Speech

Derivative-Formation Strategies

Agustín-Llach, M. P. (2023). Foreign language semantic categorization: Evidence from the semantic network and word connections. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 14(1), 205-222. https://doi.org/10.22055/RALS.2023.18077

Alibeigynejad, M., & Fahimniya, F. (2015). The effect of using keyword method on EFL learners' learning and retrieving English verb types. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 5(Special Issue), 35-42. https://doi.org/10.22055/rals.2015.11267

Bauer, L., & Nation, I. S. P. (2020). English morphology for the language teaching profession. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367855222

Bauer, L., & Nation, P. (1993). Word families. International Journal of Lexicography, 6(4), 253-279. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijl/6.4.253

Boers, F. (2021). Evaluating second language vocabulary and grammar instruction: A synthesis of the research on teaching words, phrases, and patterns. Routledge.

Brown, D., Stoeckel, T., McLean, S., & Stewart, J. (2020). The most appropriate lexical unit for L2 vocabulary research and pedagogy: A brief review of the evidence. Applied Linguistics, 43(3), 596-602. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amaa061

Candry, S., Deconinck, J., & Eyckmans, J. (2017). Metalinguistic awareness in l2 vocabulary acquisition: Which factors influence learners’ motivations of form-meaning connections? Language Awareness, 26(3), 226-243. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2017.1400040

Clahsen, H., & Felser, C. (2006). Continuity and shallow structures in language processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27(1), 107-126. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716406060206

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education. Routledge.

Dang, T. N. Y., Coxhead, A., & Webb, S. (2017). The academic spoken word list. Language Learning, 67(4), 959-997. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12253

Deconinck, J., Boers, F., & Eyckmans, J. (2014). Looking for form-meaning motivation in new L2 words: A think-aloud study among proficient learners of English. English Text Construction, 7(2), 249-280. https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.7.2.04dec

Ellis, N. C., & Schmidt, R. (1998). Rules or associations in the acquisition of morphology? The frequency by regularity interaction in human and PDP learning of morphosyntax. Language and Cognitive Processes, 13(2/3), 307-336. https://doi.org/10.1080/016909698386546

Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. SAGE.

Graves, M. F., Elmore, J., & Fitzgerald, J. (2019). The vocabulary of core reading programs. The Elementary School Journal, 119(3), 386-416. https://doi.org/10. 1086/701653

Griffiths, C. (2018). The strategy factor in successful language learning: The tornado effect. Multilingual Matters.

Gu, P. Y. (2018). Validation of an online questionnaire of vocabulary learning strategies for ESL learners. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8(2), 325-350. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2018.8.2.7

Ishii, T., & Schmitt, N. (2009). Developing an integrated diagnostic test of vocabulary size and depth. RELC Journal, 40(1), 5-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688208101452

Iwaizumi, E., & Webb, S. (2021). To what extent does productive derivational knowledge of adult L1 speakers and L2 learners at two educational levels differ? TESOL Journal, 12(4), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.640

Iwaizumi, E., & Webb, S. (2022). Measuring L1 and L2 productive derivational knowledge: How many derivatives can L1 and L2 learners with differing vocabulary levels produce? TESOL Quarterly, 56(1), 100-129. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3035

Iwaizumi, E., & Webb, S. (2023). To what extent do learner- and word-related variables affect production of derivatives? Language Learning, 73(1), 301-336. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12524

Larson-Hall, J. (2016). A guide to doing statistics in second language research using SPSS and R. Routledge.

Laufer, B. (2021). Lemmas, flemmas, word families, and common sense. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 43(5), 965-968. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263121000656

Laufer, B., Webb, S., Kim, S. K., & Yohanan, B. (2021). How well do learners know derived words in a second language? ITL-International Journal of Applied Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.20020.lau

McCutchen, D., & Stull, S. (2015). Morphological awareness and children’s writing: accuracy, error, and invention. Reading and Writing, 28(2), 271-289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-014-9524-1

Mochizuki, M., & Aizawa, K. (2000). An affix acquisition order for EFL learners: An exploratory study. System, 28(2), 291-304. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(00)00013-0

Mousavi, S. H., Amouzadeh, M., & Rezaei, V. (2015). Application of frame semantics to teaching seeing and hearing vocabulary to Iranian EFL learners. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 6(1), 98-117. https://rals.scu.ac.ir/article_11262.html

Nation, I. S. P. (2004). A study of the most frequent word families in the British National Corpus. In P. Bogaards & B. Laufer (Eds.), Vocabulary in a second language: Selection, acquisition, and testing (pp. 3-13). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.10

Nation, I. S. P. (2013). Learning vocabulary in another language (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139858656

Nguyen, B. T. T., & Nguyen, L. Q. (2024). Measuring productive derivative knowledge of Vietnamese EFL learners: The role of headword scoring, vocabulary breadth, and headword familiarity. System, 123, 103322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103322

Rashidi, N., & Mirsalari, S. A. (2017). Investigating the relationship between Iranian EFL learners’ use of strategies in collocating words and their proficiency level. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 8(2), 93-118. https://rals.scu.ac.ir/article_13093.html

Peters, E. (2020). Factors affecting the learning of single-word items. In S. A. Webb (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of vocabulary studies (pp. 125-142). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429291586

Sasao, Y., & Webb, S. (2017). The word part levels test. Language Teaching Research, 1(1), 12-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168815586083

Schmitt, N., & Meara, P. (1997). Researching vocabulary through a word knowledge framework. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 17-36. https://doi.org/10.101

Schmitt, N., & Zimmerman, C. B. (2002). Derivative word forms: What do learners know? TESOL Quarterly, 36, 145-171. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588328.

Silverman, D. (2021). Doing qualitative research. SAGE.

Snoder, P., & Laufer, B. (2022). EFL learners’ receptive knowledge of derived words: The case of Swedish adolescents. TESOL Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3101

Sukying, A. (2018). Investigating receptive and productive affix knowledge in EFL learners. In D. Hirsh (Ed.), Explorations in second language vocabulary research (pp. 183-218). Peter Lang.

Suzuki, Y. (2024). Skill acquisition theory: Learning-to-use and usage-for-learning in SLA. In K. McManus (Ed.), Usage in second language acquisition: Critical reflections and future directions (pp. 147-168). Routledge.

Webb, S., & Rodgers, M. P. H. (2009). Vocabulary demands of television programs. Language Learning, 59(2), 335-366. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00509.x

Webb, S., Sasao, Y., & Ballance, O. (2017). The updated vocabulary levels test: Developing and validating two new forms of the VLT. ITL – International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 168(1), 33-69. https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.168.1.02web